Login | January 30, 2025
The Akron Bar judicial candidate commission evaluates candidates
Published: September 21, 2012
The Akron Bar Association Commission on Judicial Candidates has been established by the Akron Bar Association to evaluate candidates for local judgeships. The commission rates the candidates “Highly Recommended,” “Recommended,” “Acceptable” or “Not Recommended.” Ratings are based on seven criteria: integrity, legal knowledge and ability, professional experience, judicial temperament, diligence, personal responsibility and public and community service.
All ratings require a majority vote of the commission; a rating of “Highly Recommended” requires two thirds supermajority of the commission. The ratings are not intended to be a comparison or endorsement of candidates, but represent the commission’s evaluation of each individual candidate’s qualifications for the specific office sought.
A rating of “Acceptable” requires a vote of a majority of the commission members present. If a candidate is rated “Acceptable”, a second ballot is taken to determine if the rating “Recommended” will be awarded, also requiring a vote of the majority of the commission members present. If a candidate is rated “Recommended”, a third ballot is taken to determine if the rating “Highly Recommended” will be awarded. The “Highly Recommended” rating requires the affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the commission members present.
The commission is comprised of 28 experienced members of the Akron Bar Association selected by its Municipal Courts Committee, Common Pleas & Appellate Courts Committee, Family Law Section, Probate Law Section, the chair of the commission and the Bar president. No more than 50 percent of the commission may be from any one political party. All candidates complete a questionnaire containing extensive biographical data and submit relevant materials, including writing samples. References for the candidates are interviewed and intensive interviews of the candidates are conducted.
This year the commission, chaired by Thomas E. Kot, evaluated the judicial candidates running in the election scheduled for Nov. 6, 2012.
The ratings are as follows:
9th DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE
Term Commencing February 9, 2013
Clair E. Dickinson Highly Recommended
Jennifer Hensal Acceptable
COMMON PLEAS COURT JUDGE
Unexpired Term to End January 1, 2015
Tammy O’Brien Highly Recommended
Kathryn Michael Recommended
COMMON PLEAS COURT JUDGE
Term Commencing January 1, 2013
Paul J. Gallagher Highly Recommended
Dave Lombardi Recommended
COMMON PLEAS COURT JUDGE
Term Commencing January 2, 2013
John Fickes Recommended
Amy Corrigall Jones Highly Recommended
COMMON PLEAS COURT JUDGE
Term Commencing May 17, 2013
Eddie Sipplen Acceptable
Thomas A. Teodosio Highly Recommended
PROBATE COURT JUDGE
Unexpired Term to End February 8, 2015
Alison McCarty Highly Recommended
Elinore Marsh Stormer Highly Recommended